This is the current introduction to the literature review I have written in preparation for my comprehensive exams and as a step toward the dissertation proposal. It includes the questions my dissertation will address and an overview of the relationships between topics covered in the review and my questions.
(This monster is currently 138 […]
on LIS, grad school, academia, and other random things…
infomusings
» Currently browsing: mfd
current introduction.
what has been keeping me busy.
Working on my lit review for comps. It is coming together. I intend to finish by the beginning of August. At the VERY LATEST before classes start. I don’t want to be finishing this up while I’m starting to teach.
I’ve moved from thinking of it as five separate reviews I need to do, and have begun thinking of it as one thing that really needs to be interconnected and coherent. I need for it to be obvious why I think these topics go together and inform what I want to do in my dissertation. So I have 2.75 completed separate reviews that need to be severely revised/shortened and fit into the new structure.
I have finally outlined that structure and written the initial intro to the review, which you may read behind the cut. Consider this also the official unveiling of my Really Final For Real This Time dissertation topic. *eek*
sketchy jottings on relationships between pim and concepts/categories.
Classical/rule based model seems to apply least. Kwasnik’s1rules for classification of office documents derived from smaller decisions/considerations more like other approaches.
Exemplar/prototype/similarity based models. Seems to apply a bit. Case’s2importance of form, even outside the computer. The importance of topic as classificatory cue. But a good fit? Prototype theory, especially, seems problematic. Is there a prototype […]