The journal Behavioral and Brain Sciences has a very interesting format.
Articles selected for publication are then circulated to a large number of experts in the field, who write commentary. This “Open Peer Commentary” is then published immediately following the article, and this material is often more lengthy than the article itself. Finally, there is […]
on LIS, grad school, academia, and other random things…
infomusings
» Currently browsing: research
open peer commentary
16 July 2007 at 13:36 » Comments (0)
science.
28 June 2007 at 21:13 » Comments (0)
Why is it that, in order to publish anything, it seems you are expected to always be saying something new? If your findings have already been found by someone else, your work is likely to be considered low priority or low quality for publishing.
Isn’t science partially built on the notion of confirming what we […]