<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: mind the gap.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.infomuse.net/2009/02/25/mind-the-gap/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.infomuse.net/2009/02/25/mind-the-gap/</link>
	<description>on LIS, grad school, academia, and other random things...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2011 16:22:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: trochee</title>
		<link>http://blog.infomuse.net/2009/02/25/mind-the-gap/comment-page-1/#comment-1855</link>
		<dc:creator>trochee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 18:17:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.infomuse.net/?p=219#comment-1855</guid>
		<description>seems to me like Fodor is in a knot because Clark et al. have (according to him) overlooked an internal model of mind, and cites John Searle to support him.

I think that this leaves the question unanswered, and that (say) Dennett, or possibly Turing, would argue that the &quot;internalism&quot; is itself an open question even for those of us who claim we have an internal model.

&quot;there&#039;s nothing inside [the Roomba] but cat hair and dirt; I know because I&#039;ve looked&quot; -- okay, Dr. Fodor, but if you&#039;re going to be clever like that then prepare for a visit from some intrepid neurophilosopher with a bonesaw and curiosity about the contents of your cranium: &quot;Clearly, Dr. Fodor has no internal model: there&#039;s nothing inside there but gray jiggly goo -- I know because I&#039;ve looked.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>seems to me like Fodor is in a knot because Clark et al. have (according to him) overlooked an internal model of mind, and cites John Searle to support him.</p>
<p>I think that this leaves the question unanswered, and that (say) Dennett, or possibly Turing, would argue that the &#8220;internalism&#8221; is itself an open question even for those of us who claim we have an internal model.</p>
<p>&#8220;there&#8217;s nothing inside [the Roomba] but cat hair and dirt; I know because I&#8217;ve looked&#8221; &#8212; okay, Dr. Fodor, but if you&#8217;re going to be clever like that then prepare for a visit from some intrepid neurophilosopher with a bonesaw and curiosity about the contents of your cranium: &#8220;Clearly, Dr. Fodor has no internal model: there&#8217;s nothing inside there but gray jiggly goo &#8212; I know because I&#8217;ve looked.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

